.
Feedback

McDonnell's Transportation Bill Moves Forward

The amended package would eliminate Virginia's gas tax and hike sales taxes to raise $3 billion over five years.

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell’s controversial transportation bill passed the House of Delegates Finance Committee Wednesday, moving past its first hurdle in the state's 2013 General Assembly session.

In a 14-8 vote along party lines, the committee passed McDonnell’s package, which calls for eliminating the state’s 17.5 cents per gallon gas tax and raising the state sales tax from 5 percent to 5.8 percent.

The plan would also keep the 17.5 tax on diesel fuel and increase vehicle registration fees. It would also raise the amount of the state’s sales tax that goes to transportation from 5 to 75 cents over a five-year period.

McDonnell said the bill would raise approximately $3 billion in that time, including $1.8 billion for new construction.

The committee made some amendments to the bill, including an exemption for owners of natural gas vehicles from paying the $100 annual fee for alternative fuel vehicles and refunds for drivers who use diesel-powered cars for personal use.

“This first vote clearly demonstrates a growing, and bipartisan, consensus that transportation is a core function of government and our investments in building and maintaining our highways, transit systems and railroads is of utmost importance to the citizens of Virginia,” he said in a statement Wednesday. “Today marks the first positive step forward in our effort to enact a long overdue, long-term transportation funding solution.”

Four Democrats voted for the bill Wednesday.

Del. Mark Keam, who represents Vienna said: "Since transportation funding is so critical, I voted to have this bill considered on the floor," he said in a series of tweets late Wednesday.  "I could've voted against McDonnell's transport bill. But I believe it's my duty as a state rep to try to find a solution."

"I'm sure many will disagree with my Committee vote but I think it's better to move the process along then to kill this bill in Committee," he continued.

Responding to a voter, he wrote "clearly, [the] easy vote would have been 'no.' But I don't think I was elected to take the easy way out."

A recent poll from Christopher Newport University showed 63 percent of Virginia voters support McDonnell's plan.

But support from some of McDonnell’s fellow legislators has been lukewarm.

In a statement after the plan was unveiled, State Sen. Chap Petersen (D-Fairfax City) again spoke out against the plan for doing away with the gas tax.

“Eliminating the gas tax paid by highway users and raising taxes on all other Virginians to pave our roads makes no sense,” he said. “Indeed, eliminating our traditional road funding because cars are more efficient makes about as much sense as canceling your child’s college fund because tuition keeps rising.”

Petersen has an alternative plan, SB 855, that would raise the gas tax 10 cents to 27.5 cents per gallon. He estimates the move could raise $500 million a year for road projects.

The bill is currently in the Senate Finance Committee.

McDonnell took his plan on the road last week, stopping in Herndon to ask support from Northern Virginia business owners.

He’s found a friend in the Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce, which has publicly backed the package. President Jim Corcoran called it an “innovative, sustainable” funding source.

“The Fairfax Chamber supports this fair and reasonable funding solution as a major step forward in getting Virginia—especially Northern Virginia—moving again,” Corcoran said in a statement earlier this month.

Other supporters include Amtrak, the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, the Prince William Chamber of Commerce, the Virginia Association of Realtors, the Virginia Chamber of Commerce and Wawa.

Other legislators have said compromises will have to be made if the transportation problem is going to be solved.

In a Tuesday press conference, .

“Stop the legislative gridlock that keeps commuters sitting in traffic gridlock,” he said.

McDonnell’s transportation plan is expected to appear before a state senate committee before the end of the week.

How They Voted:

Yeas: Chairman Bob Purkey (R-Virginia Beach); Bobby Orrock (R-Thornburg); Tim Hugo (R-Centreville); Rich Anderson (R-Woodbridge); Scott Garrett (D-Lynchburg); Ron Villanueva (R-Virginia Beach); Brenda Pogge (R-Williamsburg); Dickie Bell (R-Staunton); Israel O’Quinn (R-Bristol); Chris Head (R-Roanoke); Joseph Johnson (D-Abingdon); Lynwood Lewis (D-Accomac); Mark Keam (D-Vienna); Matthew James (D-Portsmouth).

Nays: Kathy Byron (R-Lynchburg); Betsy Carr (D-Richmond); Ben Cline (R-Amherst); Mark Cole (R-Fredericksburg); Eileen Filler-Corn (D-Fairfax Station); Bob Marshall (R-Manassas); Lee Ware (R-Powhaten); Vivian Watts (D-Annandale).

See also:

Speak Out: Will McDonnell's Tax Plan Help Virginia?

Stay up to date on all transportation news with Vienna Patch's daily email newsletter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Chantilly Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Charles Kuhman April 5, 2013 at 07:18 pm
I have worked at the Herndon polls on several occasions, and I would like to make sure everyoneRead More understands what Fairfax County and the State of Virginina already require poll workers to do to combat voter fraud. The requirements that people work in their own precincts among their neighbors is to make the likelihood of someone committing voter fraud small at best. We are to stay there all day (5:30 am until the vote count is complete, usually a full hour after the polls close at the earliest) as another check on the chance of someone voting more than once or under more than one name. Both parties are represented among the poll workers by design to even out the chances of at least one worker knowing anyone who might walk in to vote. I have yet to work in a precinct where at least some volunteer poll watchers weren't present for either or both parties (and for all three parties in the election that include Ross Perot) for some or all of the voting hours. Poll workers are instructed on how to challenge a ballot, and I have had to do this myself on at least one occasion. A challenged ballot is sealed and kept, and after the election a panel makes a decision as to whether the ballot will be unsealed and counted. In most cases, the election is clearly won or lost without the challenged ballots, and they are destroyed unopened. I say all this to assure everyone that I feel large scale voter fraud is very unlikely. The need for other measures is unnecessary.