.
Feedback

'Zero Dark Thirty:' Bigelow's Controversial Triumph Worth Seeing

Director Kathryn Bigelow overlooked for Oscar in Best Director category.

Zero Dark Thirty, which brought in $24 million in its first two days of wide release, has been lauded worldwide and almost universally as an impressive piece of filmmaking, a movie that is anything but formulaic.  

It is always very different for those of us who live within the Washington area.  Our experience of anything political is amplified. The headquarters of the CIA, FBI, and of course, the White House, are all within driving distance. It is, therefore, nearly impossible not to have heard about the controversy surrounding this film. 

Senators Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.), Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) denounced the film, for its depiction of torture. “We believe the film is grossly inaccurate and misleading in its suggestion that torture resulted in information that led to the location of Osama bin Laden," the Senators said in a statement.  

There were even rumors it was made with the aid of classified documents. 

The film follows Maya, a CIA operative (played by Jessica Chastain), who tenaciously and single-mindedly tracks Bin Laden for years, leading to the raid on his compound and subsequent death at the hands of an elite Navy SEALs team.  The title refers to 12:30 a.m., the exact time they landed. The movie doesn't hold any punches. The opening moments are filled with voices crying for help in the towers on 9/11 in New York City.

It isn't easy to make a movie an engrossing journey when we all know the ending, but the team of director Kathryn Bigelow (Oscar winner for The Hurt Locker) and screenwriter Mark Boal have done so, creating a visceral, tension-filled feature that leads us to question what we as individuals and we as countries should find acceptable behavior in the war on terror. 

For a film with many scenes at desert outposts, in compounds and in darkened warehouses, the director's strict set decoration and the meticulousness of her shots makes every scene one where the entire screen can be examined. There are seemingly endless details included, no matter how wide the shot.   

The biggest shock of the Oscar nominations, given the high praise the movie has received by audiences and critics alike, is Bigelow's conspicuous absence from the Best Director category. Cinema Siren is of the female variety and somewhat alarmist of things that stink of sexism. She is none too pleased at the members of the Academy, wondering aloud if they feel one Oscar nomination and win for a female director each decade is all that can be countenanced. 

A study by the Los Angeles Times last year found Academy members are 94 percent Caucasian, 77 percent male, and have a median age of 62. One would imagine they would attempt to stave off cries of bigotry and narrow focus by rewarding legitimately great works by artists of all races and genders. But no. 

In its uniformly stellar cast, there are two stand-outs. One has gotten much attention, and one will hopefully see more attention in the future. Jessica Chastain, as the central character Maya, shows every reason why Hollywood has made her their "It" girl. She has already played a wide variety of characters, from the brittle grief-stricken mother in Tree of Life, to the tarnished and damaged girl looking for a new life in Lawless. 

Now in ZDT we see her build her arc from squeamish-yet-determined-newbie to unshakable and emotionally fractured badass whose obsession drives her. I should put that in caps: BADASS. Whether she has become our Homeland monster, our version of zealot or not, is for the viewer to decide.  

The other actor deserving attention (which the Academy has withheld), is Jason Clarke. Cinema Siren repeatedly sings his praises. His supporting role as bleary-eyed, seemingly unquestioning triggerman Dan, the CIA operative who heads interrogations, shows proof once again he should be climbing the A-list ladder faster. He carries a sweetness and retained humanity that strikes the viewer, and breaks our hearts even as we flinch. He is the first to start the audience asking themselves what they would do in his position.  

Bigelow was in DC Thursday, screening the film at the Newseum to an undisclosed guest list of Washington insiders and government employees. It was meant to be a low-key affair, especially after CIA acting director Mike Morell had just criticized the film's inaccurate portrayal of torture being key to finding Bin Laden. He said that only "some intelligence came from detainees subjected to enhanced techniques." MPAA chief Chris Dodd defended the film, by saying "It's a movie, not a documentary!"

Bigelow said while accepting Best Director honors at the New York Film Critics Circle ceremony: "I thankfully want to say that I'm standing in a room of people who understand that depiction is not endorsement, and if it was, no artist could ever portray inhumane practices."

It should not be a question of whether Oscar voters, or moviegoers for that matter, agree with her willingness to denounce or promote torture. The fact, whether as a woman or not, this director is able to confront such moral ambiguities unflinchingly and with such a clear aesthetic vision while finding a way to keep audiences in thrall, should be rewarded at the highest level. 

It is an unintended irony that the movie is centered on a tenacious woman rising to the top in the man's world of the CIA, and Bigelow, who brings the story to us all, is being ignored and excluded in the man's world that is the Academy. Is it too much to ask that members of the Academy see the error of their ways?  

If you, lovers of great film, support Zero Dark Thirty by going to see the film and spending your movie-going dollars, Bigelow will no doubt find some consolation. We will all have hope Chastain and Boal win Oscars for Best Actress and Best Original Screenplay, prompting Oscar voters to mend their sexist attitude.

We will also have to hope some future female directors currently in middle school will be able to thank her one day. Cinema Siren thanks her now.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Chantilly Patch? Find your Local Patch »

joe brewer January 13, 2013 at 10:19 pm
We all thank God that the pos is dead in the end!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Charles Kuhman April 5, 2013 at 07:18 pm
I have worked at the Herndon polls on several occasions, and I would like to make sure everyoneRead More understands what Fairfax County and the State of Virginina already require poll workers to do to combat voter fraud. The requirements that people work in their own precincts among their neighbors is to make the likelihood of someone committing voter fraud small at best. We are to stay there all day (5:30 am until the vote count is complete, usually a full hour after the polls close at the earliest) as another check on the chance of someone voting more than once or under more than one name. Both parties are represented among the poll workers by design to even out the chances of at least one worker knowing anyone who might walk in to vote. I have yet to work in a precinct where at least some volunteer poll watchers weren't present for either or both parties (and for all three parties in the election that include Ross Perot) for some or all of the voting hours. Poll workers are instructed on how to challenge a ballot, and I have had to do this myself on at least one occasion. A challenged ballot is sealed and kept, and after the election a panel makes a decision as to whether the ballot will be unsealed and counted. In most cases, the election is clearly won or lost without the challenged ballots, and they are destroyed unopened. I say all this to assure everyone that I feel large scale voter fraud is very unlikely. The need for other measures is unnecessary.